← Back to all bills

Licensing Hours Extensions Act 2026

UnassignedActRoyal Assent
Last updated: 13 February 2026 · Analysed: 15 February 2026
This bill amends the Licensing Act 2003 to change the parliamentary procedure required for granting orders that extend licensing hours for special occasions. It replaces the affirmative resolution procedure with the negative resolution procedure, thereby allowing the Home Secretary to extend opening hours without requiring active prior approval from both Houses of Parliament.

📊 Impact Analysis

By streamlining the legislative process, the government can more easily grant licensing extensions for events of national significance, directly benefiting pubs, clubs, and restaurants through increased sales. While there may be minor productivity losses in other sectors due to the 'hangover effect' following late-night events, the concentrated injection of liquidity into the struggling high street and hospitality industry represents a net economic gain. Furthermore, the certainty of a streamlined process allows businesses to plan staffing and stock levels more effectively.
Switching from an affirmative to a negative resolution procedure reduces the consumption of valuable parliamentary time and resources previously required to debate routine extensions. Additionally, by facilitating these extensions, the Treasury stands to gain from increased receipts in Value Added Tax (VAT) and alcohol duties generated by the additional hours of trade, creating a modest but positive fiscal impact.
The legislation applies generally to the licensing regime across England and Wales and does not target specific demographics. While there is a risk that residents in areas with high densities of nightlife—often lower-income areas—may face increased disturbance without the check of parliamentary debate, this is a general planning issue rather than a specific injustice against a protected minority group. The mechanism for extending hours remains tied to occasions of national significance rather than specific communities.
On a personal level, the bill facilitates greater social autonomy by making it easier for the state to allow citizens to celebrate later into the night without rigid curfews. However, constitutionally, it shifts power from the Legislature to the Executive by removing the requirement for active parliamentary consent (affirmative resolution). This reduces the democratic scrutiny applied to the Home Secretary's decisions, representing a minor erosion of checks and balances in favor of administrative efficiency.
For participants in the night-time economy, the bill enhances quality of life by facilitating community celebration and social interaction during major national events. Conversely, for residents living near venues, easier extensions may lead to increased sleep disturbance, noise pollution, and anti-social behavior. Additionally, extended drinking hours historically correlate with increased strain on police and NHS resources, potentially impacting the welfare of frontline staff.
The procedural change itself has no direct environmental consequence. Second-order effects might include a marginal increase in energy consumption (lighting, heating) and waste generation (single-use plastics, glass) associated with longer operating hours in hospitality venues. However, as these extensions are sporadic and tied to specific events, the aggregate environmental impact is too low to be considered significant.